Trombocitopenia inmunitaria, como efecto adverso a vacuna frente a COVID-19, descripción de dos casos y revisión de bibliografía / Immune thrombocytopenia, as an adverse effect of the COVID-19 vaccine. Two 2 case studies and literature review

La trombopenia inducida por fármacos (DITP) es una trombocitopenia adquirida debida a anticuerpos reactivos a plaquetas dependientes de fármacos que causan destrucción plaquetaria. Desde el inicio de la vacunación para SARC-CoV-2 han ido apareciendo casos de diferentes efectos adversos. Entre los más sonados se encuentra la trombosis trombopénica inmune. Presentamos dos pacientes con trombopenia aislada con antecedente de vacunación para COVID-19 en las semanas previas como evento desencadenante, tras haber hecho un estudio completo que descartó las otras posibles etiologías, así como una revisión bibliográfica sobre esta entidad.(AU)

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP) is an acquired thrombocytopenia due to drug-dependent platelet-reactive antibodies causing platelet destruction. Since the onset of vaccination for SARS-CoV-2, cases of different adverse effects have been appearing. Among the most notorious is immune thrombopenic thrombosis. We report two patients with isolated thrombocytopenia with a history of vaccination for COVID19 in the previous weeks as the triggering event; after having performed a full study that ruled out other possible aetiologies, as well as a bibliographic review on this entity.(AU)

Efecto de la ganancia ponderal gestacional en una cohorte de gestantes con obesidad operadas y no operadas de cirugía bariátrica / Effect of gest ational weight gain in a cohort of pregnancy women with obesity operated and not operated for bariatric surgery

Objetivo: determinar el efecto de la ganancia de peso gestacional y los resultados perinatales en mujeres con obesidad operadas y no operadas de cirugía bariátrica. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio retrospectivo observacional de cohortes. La ganancia ponderal gestacional fue clasificada como insuficiente, adecuada o excesiva según las guías del Instituto de Medicina de Estados Unidos: 4,99-9,07 kg para índice de masa corporal (IMC) > 30 kg/m2. La ganancia ponderal se calculó con la diferencia entre el peso de la primera visita del primer trimestre y el peso en la visita del tercer trimestre. Los resultados examinados incluyeron variables anteparto (diabetes gestacional, hipertensión gestacional, preeclampsia, ruptura prematura de membranas, placenta previa, desprendimiento prematuro de placenta, retraso de crecimiento intrauterino, corioamnionitis, aborto espontáneo), intraparto (parto inducido, parto vaginal, ventosa, fórceps, cesárea, distocia de hombros), posparto (hemorragia posparto, necesidad de trasfusión posparto, anemia posparto, necesidad de asistencia a Urgencias, muerte materna, desgarro posparto, trombosis posparto) y neonatales (parto pretérmino, percentil peso > 90, percentil peso < 10, puntuación Apgar < 7, malformaciones). Mediante el paquete estadístico SPSS 22.0 se realizó un análisis estadístico de los datos. Resultados: se reclutaron 256 mujeres; 38 (14,58 %) eran gestantes poscirugía bariátrica y las 218 (85,15 %) restantes eran gestantes con obesidad no operadas. De las gestantes con obesidad no operadas, 119 (46,68 %) tenían obesidad grado 1 (IMC 30-34,9) y 99 (38,67 %) tenían obesidad grados 2 y 3 (IMC > 35). Se realizó un análisis global y por subgrupos. En el análisis global tuvieron ganancia insuficiente 78 (30,46 %), ganancia adecuada 117 (45,70 %) y excesiva 61 (23,82 %). En conjunto, la ganancia ponderal insuficiente se asoció con menor probabilidad de hipertensión arterial (HTA)...(AU)

Objective: to determine the effect of gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes in obese women who underwent and did not undergo bariatric surgery. Material and methods: a retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. The gestational weight gain was classified as insufficient, adequate or excessive according to the guidelines of the United States Institute of Medicine: 4.99-9.07 kg for body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/ m2. Weight gain was calculated as the difference between the weight at the first visit of the 1st trimester and the weight at the visit of the 3rd trimester. Outcomes examined included antepartum variables (gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes, placenta previa, placental abruption, intrauterine growth retardation, chorioammionitis, spontaneous abortion), intrapartum variables (induced delivery, vaginal delivery, vacuum, forceps delivery, cesarean section, shoulder dystocia), postpartum variables (postpartum hemorrhage, need for postpartum transfusion, postpartum anemia, need for emergency care, maternal death, postpartum tear, postpartum thrombosis) and neonatal variables (preterm delivery, weight percentile > 90, weight percentile < 10, Apgar score < 7, malformations). Using the statistical package SPSS 22.0, a statistical analysis of the data was performed. Results: two hundred and fifty-six women were recruited; 38 (14.58 %) were pregnant after bariatric surgery and 218 (85.15 %) were pregnant women with obesity who had not been operated on. Of the pregnant women with obesity who had not been operated on, 119 (46.68 %) had grade1 obesity (BMI 30-34.9), and 99 (38.67 %) had grade 2 and 3 obesity (BMI > 35). A global and subgroup analysis was performed. In the overall analysis, 78 (30.46 %) had insufficient gain, 117 (45.70 %) had adequate gain, and 61 (23.82 %) excessive gain. Overall, insufficient weight gain was associated with a lower probability of...(AU)

[Effectiveness of immunonutrition in the perioperative nutritional management of gastric cancer]. / Efectividad de la inmunonutrición en el manejo nutricional perioperatorio del cáncer gástrico.

OBJECTIVE: to assess the effectiveness of immunonutrition (IN) compared to standard nutritional formulas in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this is a real-life, observational retrospective cohort study. It included 134 patients, all of whom underwent gastrectomy at Montecelo Hospital between December 2019 and December 2022. Group A (N = 79 patients) received standard nutrition, and Group B (N = 55 patients) received formulas containing arginine, nucleotides, omega-3 fatty acids, and extra virgin olive oil. This protocol was carried out both pre and postoperatively for an average period of 10 days. The study evaluated hospital stay, the need for parenteral nutrition (PN), postoperative complications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 16.1.® Results: in the IN group compared to the standard nutrition group, the hospital stay was reduced by 34 % (p < 0.001). The number of patients requiring PN decreased by 21.1 % (p = 0.022), and its duration also decreased by 33.2 % (p < 0.001). The risk of infectious complications was lower with IN, specifically 70.1 % less (p < 0.001). As for other postoperative complications, IN reduced the risk of intestinal obstruction by 84 % (p < 0.002), suture dehiscence by 90.9 % (p < 0.001), blood transfusion by 99.8 % (p < 0.001), pleural effusion by 90.9 % (p = 0.021), acute renal failure by 84.02 % (p = 0.047), and surgical re-intervention by 69.93 % (p < 0.011). In the IN group, there was less weight loss (p = 0.048) and a smaller decrease in postoperative albumin (p = 0.005) and cholesterol (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: immunonutrition reduces postoperative complications, decreases hospital stay, and optimizes nutritional outcomes.

Efectividad de la administración de urea para el tratamiento de la hiponatremia en la insuficiencia cardiaca / Effectiveness of urea administration for the treatment of hyponatremia in heart failure

Objetivos Valorar la eficacia y la seguridad de la urea en pacientes con hiponatremia e insuficiencia cardiaca (IC). Métodos y resultados Se trata de un estudio observacional retrospectivo analítico de pacientes con IC e hiponatremia (Na+ <135mmol/l). Se incluyeron 49 pacientes tratados con urea y 47 pacientes que no recibieron urea, todos ellos bajo tratamiento estándar (según práctica clínica habitual) de la IC, con seguimiento en el hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro de Vigo entre enero de 2013 y mayo de 2022. En el estudio se evaluó la normalización de los niveles de sodio (Na >135mmol/l). La natremia al inicio del tratamiento con urea oral era de 127±5,22mmol/l, a las 24horas el sodio era de 128±2,47 (p<0,009) y la media el día de la normalización fue de 135,19±4,23mmol/l (p<0,005). Los días de media para conseguir la normalización del sodio fueron 5,03±2,37. La uremia al inicio del tratamiento con urea era de 73±46,93mg/dl y la media el día de la normalización del Na+ fue de 116,05±63,64mg/dl (p<0,002). La dosis media de urea oral fue 22,5g/día. No se observaron efectos adversos relevantes, ni cambios en cuanto a las cifras de creatinina. Conclusiones El tratamiento con urea oral añadido al tratamiento estándar, durante cortos periodos de tiempo, es seguro y eficaz para corregir la natremia en pacientes con IC hipervolémica con hiponatremia.

Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of urea in patients with hyponatremia and heart failure (HF). Methods and results This is a retrospective observational analytical study of patients with HF and hyponatremia (Na+ <135mmol/L). Forty-nine patients treated with urea and 47 patients who did not receive urea, all under standard treatment (according to usual clinical practice) for HF, were included and followed up at Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital in Vigo (Spain) between January 2013 and May 2022. The study evaluated the normalization of sodium levels (Na >135mmol/L). The initial natremia at the start of oral urea treatment was 127±5.22 mmol/L, at 24h the sodium level was 128±2.47 (P<.009), and the mean on the day of normalization was 135.19±4.23mmol/L (P<.005). The average number of days to achieve sodium normalization was 5.03±2.37 days. The initial uremia at the start of urea treatment was 73±46.93mg/dL, and the mean on the day of Na+ normalization was 116.05±63.64mg/dL (P<.002). The average oral urea dose was 22.5g/day. No relevant adverse effects were observed, nor were there significant changes in creatinine levels. Conclusions Oral urea treatment, when added to standard treatment for short periods of time, is safe and effective in correcting natremia in patients with hypervolemic HF with hyponatremia. (AU)

Efectividad de la administración de urea para el tratamiento de la hiponatremia en la insuficiencia cardiaca / Effectiveness of urea administration for the treatment of hyponatremia in heart failure

Objetivos Valorar la eficacia y la seguridad de la urea en pacientes con hiponatremia e insuficiencia cardiaca (IC). Métodos y resultados Se trata de un estudio observacional retrospectivo analítico de pacientes con IC e hiponatremia (Na+ <135mmol/l). Se incluyeron 49 pacientes tratados con urea y 47 pacientes que no recibieron urea, todos ellos bajo tratamiento estándar (según práctica clínica habitual) de la IC, con seguimiento en el hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro de Vigo entre enero de 2013 y mayo de 2022. En el estudio se evaluó la normalización de los niveles de sodio (Na >135mmol/l). La natremia al inicio del tratamiento con urea oral era de 127±5,22mmol/l, a las 24horas el sodio era de 128±2,47 (p<0,009) y la media el día de la normalización fue de 135,19±4,23mmol/l (p<0,005). Los días de media para conseguir la normalización del sodio fueron 5,03±2,37. La uremia al inicio del tratamiento con urea era de 73±46,93mg/dl y la media el día de la normalización del Na+ fue de 116,05±63,64mg/dl (p<0,002). La dosis media de urea oral fue 22,5g/día. No se observaron efectos adversos relevantes, ni cambios en cuanto a las cifras de creatinina. Conclusiones El tratamiento con urea oral añadido al tratamiento estándar, durante cortos periodos de tiempo, es seguro y eficaz para corregir la natremia en pacientes con IC hipervolémica con hiponatremia.

Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of urea in patients with hyponatremia and heart failure (HF). Methods and results This is a retrospective observational analytical study of patients with HF and hyponatremia (Na+ <135mmol/L). Forty-nine patients treated with urea and 47 patients who did not receive urea, all under standard treatment (according to usual clinical practice) for HF, were included and followed up at Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital in Vigo (Spain) between January 2013 and May 2022. The study evaluated the normalization of sodium levels (Na >135mmol/L). The initial natremia at the start of oral urea treatment was 127±5.22 mmol/L, at 24h the sodium level was 128±2.47 (P<.009), and the mean on the day of normalization was 135.19±4.23mmol/L (P<.005). The average number of days to achieve sodium normalization was 5.03±2.37 days. The initial uremia at the start of urea treatment was 73±46.93mg/dL, and the mean on the day of Na+ normalization was 116.05±63.64mg/dL (P<.002). The average oral urea dose was 22.5g/day. No relevant adverse effects were observed, nor were there significant changes in creatinine levels. Conclusions Oral urea treatment, when added to standard treatment for short periods of time, is safe and effective in correcting natremia in patients with hypervolemic HF with hyponatremia. (AU)

[Effectiveness of urea administration for the treatment of hyponatremia in heart failure]. / Efectividad de la administración de urea para el tratamiento de la hiponatremia en la insuficiencia cardiaca.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of urea in patients with hyponatremia and heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective observational analytical study of patients with HF and hyponatremia (Na+ <135mmol/L). Forty-nine patients treated with urea and 47 patients who did not receive urea, all under standard treatment (according to usual clinical practice) for HF, were included and followed up at Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital in Vigo (Spain) between January 2013 and May 2022. The study evaluated the normalization of sodium levels (Na >135mmol/L). The initial natremia at the start of oral urea treatment was 127±5.22 mmol/L, at 24h the sodium level was 128±2.47 (P<.009), and the mean on the day of normalization was 135.19±4.23mmol/L (P<.005). The average number of days to achieve sodium normalization was 5.03±2.37 days. The initial uremia at the start of urea treatment was 73±46.93mg/dL, and the mean on the day of Na+ normalization was 116.05±63.64mg/dL (P<.002). The average oral urea dose was 22.5g/day. No relevant adverse effects were observed, nor were there significant changes in creatinine levels. CONCLUSIONS: Oral urea treatment, when added to standard treatment for short periods of time, is safe and effective in correcting natremia in patients with hypervolemic HF with hyponatremia.

[Effect of gestational weight gain in a cohort of pregnancy women with obesity operated and not operated for bariatric surgery]. / Efecto de la ganancia ponderal gestacional en una cohorte de gestantes con obesidad operadas y no operadas de cirugía bariátrica.

Introduction: Objective: to determine the effect of gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes in obese women who underwent and did not undergo bariatric surgery. Material and methods: a retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. The gestational weight gain was classified as insufficient, adequate or excessive according to the guidelines of the United States Institute of Medicine: 4.99-9.07 kg for body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. Weight gain was calculated as the difference between the weight at the first visit of the 1st trimester and the weight at the visit of the 3rd trimester. Outcomes examined included antepartum variables (gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes, placenta previa, placental abruption, intrauterine growth retardation, chorioammionitis, spontaneous abortion), intrapartum variables (induced delivery, vaginal delivery, vacuum, forceps delivery, cesarean section, shoulder dystocia), postpartum variables (postpartum hemorrhage, need for postpartum transfusion, postpartum anemia, need for emergency care, maternal death, postpartum tear, postpartum thrombosis) and neonatal variables (preterm delivery, weight percentile > 90, weight percentile < 10, Apgar score < 7, malformations). Using the statistical package SPSS 22.0, a statistical analysis of the data was performed. Results: two hundred and fifty-six women were recruited; 38 (14.58 %) were pregnant after bariatric surgery and 218 (85.15 %) were pregnant women with obesity who had not been operated on. Of the pregnant women with obesity who had not been operated on, 119 (46.68 %) had grade 1 obesity (BMI 30-34.9), and 99 (38.67 %) had grade 2 and 3 obesity (BMI > 35). A global and subgroup analysis was performed. In the overall analysis, 78 (30.46 %) had insufficient gain, 117 (45.70 %) had adequate gain, and 61 (23.82 %) excessive gain. Overall, insufficient weight gain was associated with a lower probability of gestational hypertension (p < 0.015) and forceps delivery (p < 0.000) and large for gestational age newborn (p < 0.000). On the other hand, insufficient weight gain was associated with a higher probability of intrauterine growth retardation (p 0.044), peripartum infection (0.022), preterm delivery (0.006), and delivery < 35 weeks (p 0.016). Excessive weight gain was associated with a higher probability of gestational hypertension (p 0.025), induced labor (p 0.009), forceps delivery (p 0.011) and large for gestational age newborn (p 0.006). Pregnancies after bariatric surgery had fewer overall complications compared to the other groups. Conclusions: insufficient and excessive weight gain worsens perinatal outcomes. Adequate weight gain does not increase complications and produces some benefits.

Introducción: Objetivo: determinar el efecto de la ganancia de peso gestacional y los resultados perinatales en mujeres con obesidad operadas y no operadas de cirugía bariátrica. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio retrospectivo observacional de cohortes. La ganancia ponderal gestacional fue clasificada como insuficiente, adecuada o excesiva según las guías del Instituto de Medicina de Estados Unidos: 4,99-9,07 kg para índice de masa corporal (IMC) > 30 kg/m2. La ganancia ponderal se calculó con la diferencia entre el peso de la primera visita del primer trimestre y el peso en la visita del tercer trimestre. Los resultados examinados incluyeron variables anteparto (diabetes gestacional, hipertensión gestacional, preeclampsia, ruptura prematura de membranas, placenta previa, desprendimiento prematuro de placenta, retraso de crecimiento intrauterino, corioamnionitis, aborto espontáneo), intraparto (parto inducido, parto vaginal, ventosa, fórceps, cesárea, distocia de hombros), posparto (hemorragia posparto, necesidad de trasfusión posparto, anemia posparto, necesidad de asistencia a Urgencias, muerte materna, desgarro posparto, trombosis posparto) y neonatales (parto pretérmino, percentil peso > 90, percentil peso < 10, puntuación Apgar < 7, malformaciones). Mediante el paquete estadístico SPSS 22.0 se realizó un análisis estadístico de los datos. Resultados: se reclutaron 256 mujeres; 38 (14,58 %) eran gestantes poscirugía bariátrica y las 218 (85,15 %) restantes eran gestantes con obesidad no operadas. De las gestantes con obesidad no operadas, 119 (46,68 %) tenían obesidad grado 1 (IMC 30-34,9) y 99 (38,67 %) tenían obesidad grados 2 y 3 (IMC > 35). Se realizó un análisis global y por subgrupos. En el análisis global tuvieron ganancia insuficiente 78 (30,46 %), ganancia adecuada 117 (45,70 %) y excesiva 61 (23,82 %). En conjunto, la ganancia ponderal insuficiente se asoció con menor probabilidad de hipertensión arterial (HTA) gestacional (p 0,015) y parto con fórceps (p 0,000) y grande para edad gestacional (p 0,000). Por otro lado, la ganancia ponderal insuficiente se asoció a mayor probabilidad de retraso de crecimiento intrauterino (p 0,044), infección periparto (0,022), parto pretérmino (0,006) y parto < 35 semanas (p 0,016). La ganancia ponderal excesiva se asoció a mayor probabilidad de HTA gestacional (p 0,025), parto inducido (p 0,009), parto por fórceps (p 0,011) y grande para edad gestacional (p 0,006). Las gestaciones poscirugía bariátrica tuvieron menos complicaciones globales respecto al resto de grupos. Conclusiones: la ganancia ponderal insuficiente y excesiva empeora los resultados perinatales. La ganancia ponderal adecuada no aumenta las complicaciones y produce algunos beneficios.